Legal Consequences Dispute Settlement Body Decision 477-478 Concerning Protection and Empowerment of The Farmers

Authors

  • Sihnomo Abu Hilmy University of Diponegoro, Indonesia, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33096/sjijl.v3i1.32

Keywords:

DS 477-478, WTO, Protection, Empowerment, Farmer

Abstract

Agriculture has an important role in providing food for the community. The Increasing of open world trade, especially in food products, causes prices of domestic food products to be affected by the situation and conditions of international food prices. To protect farmers, the Law Number 19 of 2013 concerning Protection and Empowerment of Farmers has been enacted. In the implementation of the law, especially Article 30 Paragraph (1), received many complaints from Indonesian trading partners, such as the United States and New Zealand who stated that these rules were inconsistent with the GATT provisions. The research method in writing this journal is a normative juridical approach method. In summary, the conclusions from the results of the first discussion, the protection of farmers in addressing world trade is regulated in Article 30 Paragraph (1) of the article aimed at protecting farmers as food producers from loss of price risk due to uncontrolled import of agricultural commodities. Second, Responding to the DS 477-478 WTO ruling it is necessary to revise Article 30 Paragraph (1) because it is contrary to the principle of quantitative restrictive prohibition. Changes to the article should still be used as an instrument to protect farmers as food producers by harmonizing the provisions contained in the WTO

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aditya, Oktaviano. (2017). Peran World Trade Organization (WTO) Dalam Menyelesaikan Sengketa Perdagangan Daging Sapi Antara Amerika-Indonesia Tahun 2012-2016, Jurnal FISP Vol. 4. No.2
Adolf, Huala (2005). Hukum Perdagangan Internasional, Raja Grafindo Persada:Jakarta.
Erwidodo, (2017) Menyikapi Keputusan Panel DSB-WTO Untuk Kasus Kebijakan Impor Produk Hortikultura, Hewan, dan Produk Hewan (PSEKP:Kementerian Pertanian)
Muttaqien, Raisul (2006). Teori Umum tentang Hukum dan Negara. Nuansa & Nusamedia:Bandung.
Purwanto, Harry. (2009). Keberadaan Asas Pacta sunt servanda Dalam Perjanjian Internasional, Mimbar Hukum, Jurnal berkala FH UGM, Volume 21.
Purwanto, Harry. (2011). Keberadaan Asas Rebus Sic Stantibus dalam Perjanjian Internasional, Mimbar Hukum, Jurnal berkala FH UGM.
Setiawan Bonnie. (2013). WTO dan perdagangan abad 21, Resist Book:Yogyakarta.
Shamelenbach, Kirsten, DÖrr, Oliver. (2012). Vienna Convention on the Law Treaties: A Commentary, (Jerman:Springer).
Sistem penyelesaian sengketa WTO oleh Direktorat Perdagangan Perindustrian, Investasi, dan HKI, Direktorat Jenderal Multilateral Kementerian Luar Negeri.
Soemitro, Rony Hanintjo. (1983). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum. Ghalia Indonesia: Jakarta.
Starke, J.G. (2004). Pengantar Hukum Internasional, Sinar Grafika:Jakarta.
Sunandar, Taryana, (2016) Penulisan Karya Ilmiah tentang Perkembangan Hukum Perdagangan Internasional dari GATT 1947 sampai Terbentuknya WTO.
Sutrismo, N. (2007). Memperkuat Sistem Hukum Remedi Perdagangan, Melindungi Industri Dalam Negeri. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 14(2).
Wangga, M. S. E., Kardono, R. B. A., & Wirawan, A. (2019). Penegakan Hukum Korupsi Politik. Kanun: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 21(1), 39-60.
WWF,”Agriculture In The Uruguay Round: Implications For Sustainable Development In Developing Countries”, didalam Third World resurgence No. 100/101 dec. 98/jan.99, The WTO, Agriculture and Food Security.
Undang-undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2000 tentang Perjanjian Internasional (Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2000 Nomor 185, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 4012).
Article 14 Vienna Convention of the Law of Treaties 1969.

Published

2020-04-21

How to Cite

Hilmy, S. A. (2020). Legal Consequences Dispute Settlement Body Decision 477-478 Concerning Protection and Empowerment of The Farmers. Substantive Justice International Journal of Law, 3(1), 56–73. https://doi.org/10.33096/sjijl.v3i1.32

Citation Check