Promoting Justice through Membership Rights: Insights from International and Municipal Law
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56087/substantivejustice.v7i2.302Keywords:
Membership Rights, International Law, International Organization, Municipal lawAbstract
The paper aims to examine how international law can be advanced through membership rights, with a particular focus on international organizations and municipal laws. It explores how treaty-based frameworks in international law facilitate cooperation among states, while municipal law operates within the sovereign jurisdiction of individual states. The paper highlights key distinctions in the regulation and enforcement of membership rights within these two systems. It may be argued that while international organizations provide a platform for collective action on global issues, enforcement mechanisms remain limited due to the lack of centralized legislative or executive authorities. These structural limitations create disparities among states, where weaker states may face indirect subjugation in the face of international negotiations. The paper employs a doctrinal approach by identifying and analyzing relevant treaties, laws, case law, and scholarly works. It demonstrates how international and municipal legal systems intersect, especially through human rights treaties, which enable individuals to access global judicial mechanisms. The paper reveals that, despite the existence of global justice mechanisms, enforcement remains challenging due to power imbalances and concerns over state sovereignty. Reservations made by states to international treaties further undermine the effectiveness of these frameworks. The paper concludes with recommendations to strengthen the legal frameworks governing membership rights. These include eliminating state reservations to international treaties, enhancing enforcement mechanisms under international legal frameworks, and ensuring equitable participation by all member states. These measures are necessary to harmonize international and municipal legal systems for the better protection and promotion of human rights.
Downloads
References
Nottebohm Case (Liechtenstein v . Guatemala). . (1957). International Law Reports, 20. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781316151471.193
Abbott, K. W., & Snidal, D. (1998). Why states act through formal international organizations. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 42(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002798042001001
Aleksandra, D. (2012). Problems Surrounding Arrest Warrants Issued by the International Criminal Court: A Decade of Judicial Practice by Dlubak Aleksandra :: SSRN. Polish Yearbook of International Law, 32. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2407579
Alvarez, J. E. (2006). International organizations: Then and now. In American Journal of International Law (Vol. 100, Issue 2). https://doi.org/10.1017/s0002930000016687
Apter, I. (2021). City Hall v. The World – Seeking New Paradigms for Foreign Missions Municipal Taxation. McGill GLSA Research Series, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.26443/glsars.v1i1.149
Barnett, M. N., & Finnemore, M. (1999). The politics, power, and pathologies of international organizations. International Organization, 53(4). https://doi.org/10.1162/002081899551048
Barros, D. B. (2010). Hernando de Soto and property in a market economy. In Hernando de Soto and Property in a Market Economy. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315586724
Berman, P. S. (2020). Understanding global legal pluralism: From local to global, from descriptive to normative. In The Oxford Handbook of Global Legal Pluralism. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197516744.013.16
Bogdanowicz, P., & Schmidt, M. (2018). The infringement procedure in the rule of law crisis: How to make effective use of Article 258 TFEU. Common Market Law Review, 1061–1100. http://www.kluwerlawonline.com/api/Product/CitationPDFURL?file=Journals%5CCOLA%5CCOLA2018093.pdf
Brandtner, B., & Rosas, A. (1998). Human Rights and the External Relations of the European Community: An Analysis of Doctrine and Practice. European Journal of International Law, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/9.3.468
Caporaso, J. A. (1992). International relations theory and multilateralism: The search for foundations. International Organization, 46(3). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300027843
Carey, S. C., Gibney, M., & Poe, S. C. (2010). The Politics of Human Rights: The Quest for Dignity. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511780486
Cassese, S. (2016). Research handbook on Global Administrative Law. In Research Handbook on Global Administrative Law. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781783478460
Chambers, S. (1996). Reasonable democracy : Jürgen Habermas and the politics of discourse. 250.
Chandra, A. (2017). India and international law: formal dualism, functional monism. Indian Journal of International Law, 57(1–2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40901-017-0069-0
Charnovitz, S. (2006). Nongovernmental organizations and international law. In American Journal of International Law (Vol. 100, Issue 2). https://doi.org/10.1017/s0002930000016699
Chibundu, M. (1999). Making Customary International Law Through Municipal Adjudication: A Structural Inquiry. Faculty Scholarship. https://digitalcommons.law.umaryland.edu/fac_pubs/301
Collins, R., & White, N. D. (2011). International Organizations and the Idea of Autonomy: Institutional Independence in the International Legal Order. In International Organizations and the Idea of Autonomy: Institutional Independence in the International Legal Order. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203828090
Davidson, N. M. (2017). Localist administrative law. Yale Law Journal, 126(3).
Diller, J. M. (2012). Securing dignity and freedom through human rights: Article 22 of the universal declaration of human rights. Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 3.
Droesse, G. (2019). Membership in international organizations: Paradigms of membership structures, legal implications of membership and the concept of international organization. In Membership in International Organizations: Paradigms of Membership Structures, Legal Implications of Membership and the Concept of International Organization. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-327-6
Efraim, A. D. (2021). Sovereign (In) Equality in International Organizations. In Sovereign (In) Equality in International Organizations. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004478343
Facio, A., & Morgan, M. I. (2011). Equity or Equality for Women? Understanding CEDAW’s Equality Principles. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1469999
Falk, R., & Strauss, A. (2000). On the creation of a global peoples assembly: Legitimacy and the power of popular sovereignty. Stanford Journal of International Law, 36(2).
Ferrari-Bravo, L. (2024). The Structure and Process of International Law: Essays in Legal Philosophy, Doctrine and Theory. In R. S. J. Macdonald & D. M. Johnston (Eds.), The Structure and Process of International Law. Brill Nijhoff. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004636224
Fisher, D. (2022). Research Handbook on Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Law. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781839108327
Fowler, M. R., & Bunck, J. M. (1996). What constitutes the sovereign state? Review of International Studies, 22(4). https://doi.org/10.1017/s0260210500118637
Frug, G. E., & Barron, D. J. (2006). International local government law. Urban Lawyer, 38(1).
Getachew, A. (2019). The limits of sovereignty as responsibility. Constellations, 26(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8675.12387
Gross, F., & Dahl, R. A. (1957). A Preface to Democratic Theory. American Sociological Review, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.2307/2088784
Guzman, A. T. (2002). A compliance-based theory of international law. In California Law Review (Vol. 90, Issue 6). https://doi.org/10.2307/3481436
Harris, D., O’Boyle, M., Bates, E., & Buckley, C. M. (2023). Harris, O’Boyle, and Warbrick: Law of the European Convention on Human Rights. In Harris, O’Boyle, and Warbrick: Law of the European Convention on Human Rights. https://doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198862000.001.0001
Hathaway, O. A. (2005). Between power and principle: An integrated theory of international law. In University of Chicago Law Review (Vol. 72, Issue 2).
Isin, E. F., Turner, B. S., Janoski, T., Gran, B., Woodiwiss, A., Roche, M., Burchell, D., Smith, R. M., Schuck, P. H., Dagger, R., Delanty, G., Rasmussen, C., Brown, M., Lister, R., Cairns, A. C., Miller, T., Joppke, C., Sassen, S., Curtin, D., & Linklater, A. (2002). Handbook of Citizenship Studies (E. F. Isin & B. S. Turner (Eds.)). SAGE Publications Ltd.
Judgment in the Jordan Referral re Al-Bashir Appeal | International Criminal Court. (n.d.). Retrieved December 29, 2024, from https://www.icc-cpi.int/court-record/icc-02/05-01/09-397-0
Keohane, R. O. (1988). International Institutions: Two Approaches. International Studies Quarterly, 32(4). https://doi.org/10.2307/2600589
Klabbers, J. (2010). An introduction to international institutional law. In An Introduction to International Institutional Law. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511801013
Lagoutte, S. (2016). Tracing the Roles of Soft Law in Human Rights (S. Lagoutte, T. Gammeltoft-Hansen, & J. Cerone (Eds.)). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198791409.001.0001
Láncos, P. L. (2020). András Jakab – Dimitry Kochenov (eds.) – The Enforcement of EU Law and Values. Ensuring Member States’ Compliance (Book Review). Hungarian Yearbook of International Law and European Law, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.5553/hyiel/266627012019007001037
Lissitzyn, O. J. (1955). Nottebohm Case (Liechtenstein v. Guatemala). American Journal of International Law, 49(3). https://doi.org/10.2307/2194879
Loveland, I. (2021). Constitutional Law, Administrative Law, and Human Rights: A Critical Introduction (9th ed.). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198860129.001.0001
Milanovic, M. (2020). The Murder of Jamal Khashoggi: Immunities, Inviolability and the Human Right to Life. Human Rights Law Review, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngaa007
Murphy, J. (2007). Medellin v. Texas: implications of the Supreme Court’s decision for the United States and the rule of law in international affairs. - Free Online Library. Suffolk Transnat’l L. Rev. https://www.thefreelibrary.com/Medellin+v.+Texas%3A+implications+of+the+Supreme+Court%27s+decision+for...-a0190373255
Núñez, J. E. (2017). Sovereignty conflicts and international law and politics: A distributive justice issue. In Sovereignty Conflicts and International Law and Politics: A Distributive Justice Issue. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315205694
Patel, B. N. (2021). Nottebohm Case. In The World Court Reference Guide. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004481237_080
Paul, J. R. (2005). Do International Trade Institutions Contribute to Economic Growth and Development? SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.468880
Pease, K. K. S. (2018). International Organizations: Perspectives on Global Governance. Taylor & Francis. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=1klnDwAAQBAJ
Peters, A. (2016). Beyond human rights : the legal status of the individual in international law. Cambridge Studies in International and Comparative Law, 126.
Posner, E. A., & Goldsmith, J. L. (2021). The Limits of International Law Fifteen Years Later. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3803696
Reisman, W. M. (1969). The Enforcement of International Judgments. American Journal of International Law, 63(1). https://doi.org/10.2307/2197189
Republic of Rwanda. (2015). Constitution of the Republic of Rwanda of 2015. Official Gazette of the Republic, 24(December).
Reus-Smit, C. (1997). The Constitutional Structure of International Society and The Nature of Fundamental Institutions. In International Organization (Vol. 51, Issue 4). https://doi.org/10.1162/002081897550456
Rolland, S. E. (2014). Whaling in the Antarctic (Australia v. Japan: New Zealand Intervening). American Journal of International Law, 108(3). https://doi.org/10.5305/amerjintelaw.108.3.0496
Sachs, N. M. (2020). The Paris agreement in the 2020s: Breakdown or breakup. In Ecology Law Quarterly (Vol. 46, Issue 3). https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38H708140
Samantha, B. (2011). Sovereignty. Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law. https://doi.org/10.1093/LAW:EPIL/9780199231690/E1472
Sandalow, T. (1963). Limits of Municipal Power under Home Rule: A Role for the Courts, The. Minn. L. Rev., 48, 643. https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3404&context=mlr
Slaughter, A.-M. (2004). A New World Order. Princeton University Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt7rqxg
Slaughter, A.-M., Tulumello, A. S., & Wood, S. (1998). International Law and International Relations Theory: A New Generation of Interdisciplinary Scholarship. American Journal of International Law, 92(3). https://doi.org/10.2307/2997914
Somers, M. R. (1994). Rights, Relationality, and Membership: Rethinking the Making and Meaning of Citizenship. Law & Social Inquiry, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.1994.tb00390.x
Staab, A. (2008). The European union explained: Institutions, actors, global impact. In The European Union Explained: Institutions, Actors, Global Impact.
Stacy, H. (2009). Human Rights for the 21st Century: Sovereignty, Civil Society, Culture. Stanford University Press. http://cddrl.fsi.stanford.edu/publications/human_rights_for_the_21st_century_sovereignty_civil_society_culture
Steiner, H. J. (1988). Political Participation as a Human Right. Harvard Human Rights Yearbook, 1.
Stephens, B. (2017). Translating Filártiga: A comparative and international law analysis of domestic remedies for international human rights violations. In Challenges in International Human Rights Law (Vol. 3). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315095905
“The Limits of Municipal Power under Home Rule: A Role for the Courts” by Terrance Sandalow. (n.d.). Retrieved December 29, 2024, from https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/mlr/2405/
The Vienna Convention On Diplomatic Relations (1961), International Law (2005).
Viljoen, F. (2018). Understanding and Overcoming Challenges in Accessing the African Court on Human and Peoples’rights. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 67(1), 63–98. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1017/S0020589317000513
Waldron, J. (2012). The rule of law and the measure of property. In The Rule of Law and the Measure of Property. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139169318
Waters, M. A. (2007). Creeping monism: The judicial trend toward interpretive incorporation of human rights treaties. In Columbia Law Review (Vol. 107, Issue 3).
Weisburd, A. M. (2009). The international Court of Justice and the concept of state practice. University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Economic Law, 31(2). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1282684
Whaling in the antarctic (Australia v. Japan: New Zealand intervening) Judgment of 31 March 2014. (2021). https://doi.org/10.18356/9789210474573c014
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Uche Nnawulezi, Cedric Mugisha, Jean Damascene Hakuzimana, Amina Yesashimwe
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors hold the copyright and give the journal rights to the first publication with the work being simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows others to share the work with the authorship and the initial publication in this journal. Authors free to deposit versions of this work in an institutional or other repository of their choice.
