Restorative Justice Approach to The Settlement of Banking Crime Cases
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56087/substantivejustice.v6i1.206Keywords:
Restorative Justice, Corporation, Banking Crime, Economic CrimeAbstract
Banking crimes can now occur in a variety of new forms, which not only harm people or the wider community, but can also cause losses to the state and even the global economy. Settlement of corporate crimes, particularly banking crimes, still leads to legal accountability through diverse statutory instruments, and the imposition of sanctions tends to be oriented toward the perpetrator's criminal responsibility rather than representing the victim's interests. The purpose of this study is to examine non-litigation dispute resolution in the context of corporate banking crimes, as well as whether the concept of restorative justice can be used as an alternative to sanctions in the resolution of corporate banking crimes. The normative legal research method is used, with analytical, comparative, and statutory approaches. The study's findings indicate that the disputing parties can use the out-of-court settlement mechanism to reach an agreement. The use of this mechanism must be established through an injunction settlement institution, as it is known in the legal systems of the United States and the United Kingdom. The court may order a delay in examining the case at the request of one of the litigants if the applicant can demonstrate that there is no clear legal means. The concept of restorative justice opens the door to alternative solutions to corporate banking crimes, such as the deferred prosecution agreement policy.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Artadi, I. (2007). Dekonstruksi Pemahaman Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis (Ekonomi dan Keuangan) Beraspek Pidana Melalui Prosedur Perdamaian. Menuju Proses Peradilan Pidana Rekonsiliatif. Hukum Pro Justitia, 25(1), 33.
Braga, A. A., Weisburd, D., & Turchan, B. (2019). Focused deterrence strategies effects on crime: A systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 15(3), e1051. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1051
Budiyono, B. (2011). Peran Bank Indonesia dalam Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Perbankan. Dinamika Hukum, 11(Edisi Khusus Februari), 113. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2011.11.Edsus.268
Carlos, A. F., Poloni, T. E., Medici, V., Chikhladze, M., Guaita, A., & Ceroni, M. (2019). From brain collections to modern brain banks: A historical perspective. Alzheimer’s & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions, 5(1), 52–60. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trci.2018.12.002
Christian, C. (2017). Sistem Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Ditinjau dari Berbagai Konvensi Internasional (Cet-1). PT. Refika Aditama.
Danquah, J. K., Analoui, F., Boampong, B., & Amenshiah, A. K. (2022). Developing sustainable capacity for urban assemblies: Case study of a World Bank project in Ghana. Journal of International Development, 34(8), 1587–1605. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.3657
de la Feria, R. (2020). Tax Fraud and Selective Law Enforcement. Journal of Law and Society, 47(2), 240–270. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jols.12221
Handoko, P. (2020). Pembaharuan Hukum Acara Pidana Melalui Mekanisme Afdoening Buiten Process. Al-Jinayah?: Jurnal Hukum Pidana Islam, 6(2), 321. https://doi.org/10.15642/aj.2020.6.2
Hawley, S., King, C., & Lord, N. (2020). Chapter 13: Justice for whom? The Need for a Principled Approach to Deferred Prosecution Agreements in England and Wales. In Negotiated Settlements in Bribery Cases (pp. 309–346). Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788970419.00022
Hijriani, H., Borahima, A., Irwansyah, I., & Haeranah, H. (2022). Justice Corrects Criminal Accountability of Fraud Banking Corporation. I T A L I E N I S C H, 12(2), 1005–1010. https://www.italienisch.nl/index.php/VerlagSauerlander/article/view/440
Hudi, N. (2021). Pemidanaan Tindak Pidana Perikanan Berbasis Kerugian Ekonomi. Perspektif Hukum, 21(2), 222–234. https://doi.org/10.30649/ph.v21i2.98
Hutauruk, R. H. (2013). Penanggulangan Kejahatan Korporasi Melalui Pendekatan Restoratif Suatu Terobosan Hukum (Cetakan Ke). Sinar Grafika.
Iqbal, A. (2020). Penerapan Deferred Prosecution Agreement Di Indonesia Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Ekonomi Yang Dilakukan Oleh Korporasi. Jurnal Yuridis, 7(1), 191. https://doi.org/10.35586/jyur.v7i1.1867
Irwansyah, I. (2020). Penelitian Hukum: Pilihan Metode & Praktik Penulisan Artikel. Mitra Buana Media.
Koudijs, P., Salisbury, L., & Sran, G. (2021). For Richer, for Poorer: Bankers’ Liability and Bank Risk in New England, 1867 to 1880. The Journal of Finance, 76(3), 1541–1599. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.13011
Kristanto, A. (2020). Peraturan Jaksa Agung No 15 Tahun 2020 tentang Penghentian Penuntutan Berdasarkan Keadilan Restoratif. Lex Renaissance, 7(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.20885/jlr.vol7.iss1.art14
Kristina, M. (2018). Formulasi Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi dengan Adanya Peraturan Mahkamah Agung No. 13 Tahun 2016. YUSTIKA: MEDIA HUKUM DAN KEADILAN, 21(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.24123/yustika.v21i02.1709
Kusuma, M. J. (2015). Hukum Perlindungan Nasabah Bank; Upaya Hukum Melindungi Nasabah Bank Terhadap Tindak Kejahatan ITE di Bidang Perbankan. Nusamedia.
Mutiara, F. (2019). Peradilan Sederhana, Cepat, dan Biaya Ringan: Menggagas Penanganan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Melalui Konsep Plea Bargaining dan Defered Prosecution Agreement [Universitas Indonesia]. https://lontar.ui.ac.id/detail?id=20494857
Ningsih, A. S. (2020). Legal Review of Financial Technology Peer To Peer Lending Based on Indonesian Collateral Law Perspective. Substantive Justice International Journal of Law, 3(2), 109–124. https://doi.org/10.33096/substantivejustice.v3i2.73
O’Malley, P., & Smith, G. J. D. (2020). ‘Smart’ crime prevention? Digitization and racialized crime control in a Smart City. Theoretical Criminology, 26(1), 40–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480620972703
Oktarina, E. (2015). Prosedur Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Korporasi dalam Perspektif Restoratif. Disiplin, 20(07), 11.
Pradityo, R. (2016). Restorative Justice dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak. Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 5(3), 58–85. https://www.jurnalhukumdanperadilan.org/index.php/jurnalhukumperadilan/article/view/25
Prawitra Thalib, ?, Hajati, S., Kurniawan, F., & Aldiansyah, K. (2020). 5C Principles in Profit and Loss Sharing Financing on Baitul Maal Wattamwil as Islamic Micro Finance In Indonesia. Substantive Justice International Journal of Law, 3(2), 196–210. https://doi.org/10.33096/SUBSTANTIVEJUSTICE.V3I2.76
Ramadani, R., & Mamonto, M. A. W. W. (2018). Independency of the Corruption Eradication Commission of the Republic of Indonesia (KPK RI) in Indicators of Independent Regulatory Agencies (IRAs). Substantive Justice International Journal of Law, 1(2), 82. https://doi.org/10.33096/substantivejustice.v1i2.18
Ramadani, R., & Mamonto W.W., M. A. (2019). Legalitas Sanksi Pidana Pencabutan Hak Politik Bagi Terpidana Korupsi: Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia. Petitum, 7(2), 63–71. https://doi.org/10.36090/jh.v7i2%20Oktober.649
Saija, R. (2017). Hitam-Putih Hukum Perbankan (Cet.1). Deepublish.
Setiyanto, B. (2012). Peran Bank Indonesia Dalam. Yustisia Jurnal Hukum, 1(1), 33.
Shiner, R. A., & Ho, H. (2018). Deferred Prosecution Agreements and the Presumption of Innocence. Criminal Law and Philosophy, 12(4), 707–723. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11572-018-9454-0
Sinaga, M. R. (2021). Konsep Deffered Prosecution Agreement (DPA) Dalam Upaya Pemberantasan Korupsi Oleh Korporasi Di Indonesia. DE LEGA LATA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 6(1), 80–97.
Tamara, T. (2008). Mediasi Perbankan Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Antara Bank dengan Nasabah dalam Rangka Perlindungan Nasabah. Universitas Indonesia.
Timasheff, N. S., Sutherland, E. H., & Cressey, D. (1955). Principles of Criminology. The American Catholic Sociological Review, 162(2), 143. https://doi.org/10.2307/3708547
Triputra, Y. A. (2011). Tipologi Kejahatan Perbankan Ditinjau dari Undang-Undang Nomor 10 Tahun 1998 Tentang Perbankan. Disiplin, 15(1), 20–26.
Wulandari, C. (2013). Kebijakan Nonpenal dalam Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Perbankan. Pandecta: Research Law Journal, 8(2), 170. https://doi.org/10.15294/pandecta.v8i2.2683
Zulkarnain Sitompul. (2002). Perlindungan Dana Nasabah Bank Suatu Gagasan tentang Pendirian Lembaga Penjamin Simpanan di Indonesia. In Program Pascasarjana. Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Indonesia.
Braga, A. A., Weisburd, D., & Turchan, B. (2019). Focused deterrence strategies effects on crime: A systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 15(3), e1051. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1051
Budiyono, B. (2011). Peran Bank Indonesia dalam Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Perbankan. Dinamika Hukum, 11(Edisi Khusus Februari), 113. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2011.11.Edsus.268
Carlos, A. F., Poloni, T. E., Medici, V., Chikhladze, M., Guaita, A., & Ceroni, M. (2019). From brain collections to modern brain banks: A historical perspective. Alzheimer’s & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions, 5(1), 52–60. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trci.2018.12.002
Christian, C. (2017). Sistem Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Ditinjau dari Berbagai Konvensi Internasional (Cet-1). PT. Refika Aditama.
Danquah, J. K., Analoui, F., Boampong, B., & Amenshiah, A. K. (2022). Developing sustainable capacity for urban assemblies: Case study of a World Bank project in Ghana. Journal of International Development, 34(8), 1587–1605. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.3657
de la Feria, R. (2020). Tax Fraud and Selective Law Enforcement. Journal of Law and Society, 47(2), 240–270. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jols.12221
Handoko, P. (2020). Pembaharuan Hukum Acara Pidana Melalui Mekanisme Afdoening Buiten Process. Al-Jinayah?: Jurnal Hukum Pidana Islam, 6(2), 321. https://doi.org/10.15642/aj.2020.6.2
Hawley, S., King, C., & Lord, N. (2020). Chapter 13: Justice for whom? The Need for a Principled Approach to Deferred Prosecution Agreements in England and Wales. In Negotiated Settlements in Bribery Cases (pp. 309–346). Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788970419.00022
Hijriani, H., Borahima, A., Irwansyah, I., & Haeranah, H. (2022). Justice Corrects Criminal Accountability of Fraud Banking Corporation. I T A L I E N I S C H, 12(2), 1005–1010. https://www.italienisch.nl/index.php/VerlagSauerlander/article/view/440
Hudi, N. (2021). Pemidanaan Tindak Pidana Perikanan Berbasis Kerugian Ekonomi. Perspektif Hukum, 21(2), 222–234. https://doi.org/10.30649/ph.v21i2.98
Hutauruk, R. H. (2013). Penanggulangan Kejahatan Korporasi Melalui Pendekatan Restoratif Suatu Terobosan Hukum (Cetakan Ke). Sinar Grafika.
Iqbal, A. (2020). Penerapan Deferred Prosecution Agreement Di Indonesia Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Ekonomi Yang Dilakukan Oleh Korporasi. Jurnal Yuridis, 7(1), 191. https://doi.org/10.35586/jyur.v7i1.1867
Irwansyah, I. (2020). Penelitian Hukum: Pilihan Metode & Praktik Penulisan Artikel. Mitra Buana Media.
Koudijs, P., Salisbury, L., & Sran, G. (2021). For Richer, for Poorer: Bankers’ Liability and Bank Risk in New England, 1867 to 1880. The Journal of Finance, 76(3), 1541–1599. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.13011
Kristanto, A. (2020). Peraturan Jaksa Agung No 15 Tahun 2020 tentang Penghentian Penuntutan Berdasarkan Keadilan Restoratif. Lex Renaissance, 7(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.20885/jlr.vol7.iss1.art14
Kristina, M. (2018). Formulasi Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi dengan Adanya Peraturan Mahkamah Agung No. 13 Tahun 2016. YUSTIKA: MEDIA HUKUM DAN KEADILAN, 21(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.24123/yustika.v21i02.1709
Kusuma, M. J. (2015). Hukum Perlindungan Nasabah Bank; Upaya Hukum Melindungi Nasabah Bank Terhadap Tindak Kejahatan ITE di Bidang Perbankan. Nusamedia.
Mutiara, F. (2019). Peradilan Sederhana, Cepat, dan Biaya Ringan: Menggagas Penanganan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Melalui Konsep Plea Bargaining dan Defered Prosecution Agreement [Universitas Indonesia]. https://lontar.ui.ac.id/detail?id=20494857
Ningsih, A. S. (2020). Legal Review of Financial Technology Peer To Peer Lending Based on Indonesian Collateral Law Perspective. Substantive Justice International Journal of Law, 3(2), 109–124. https://doi.org/10.33096/substantivejustice.v3i2.73
O’Malley, P., & Smith, G. J. D. (2020). ‘Smart’ crime prevention? Digitization and racialized crime control in a Smart City. Theoretical Criminology, 26(1), 40–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480620972703
Oktarina, E. (2015). Prosedur Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Korporasi dalam Perspektif Restoratif. Disiplin, 20(07), 11.
Pradityo, R. (2016). Restorative Justice dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak. Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 5(3), 58–85. https://www.jurnalhukumdanperadilan.org/index.php/jurnalhukumperadilan/article/view/25
Prawitra Thalib, ?, Hajati, S., Kurniawan, F., & Aldiansyah, K. (2020). 5C Principles in Profit and Loss Sharing Financing on Baitul Maal Wattamwil as Islamic Micro Finance In Indonesia. Substantive Justice International Journal of Law, 3(2), 196–210. https://doi.org/10.33096/SUBSTANTIVEJUSTICE.V3I2.76
Ramadani, R., & Mamonto, M. A. W. W. (2018). Independency of the Corruption Eradication Commission of the Republic of Indonesia (KPK RI) in Indicators of Independent Regulatory Agencies (IRAs). Substantive Justice International Journal of Law, 1(2), 82. https://doi.org/10.33096/substantivejustice.v1i2.18
Ramadani, R., & Mamonto W.W., M. A. (2019). Legalitas Sanksi Pidana Pencabutan Hak Politik Bagi Terpidana Korupsi: Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia. Petitum, 7(2), 63–71. https://doi.org/10.36090/jh.v7i2%20Oktober.649
Saija, R. (2017). Hitam-Putih Hukum Perbankan (Cet.1). Deepublish.
Setiyanto, B. (2012). Peran Bank Indonesia Dalam. Yustisia Jurnal Hukum, 1(1), 33.
Shiner, R. A., & Ho, H. (2018). Deferred Prosecution Agreements and the Presumption of Innocence. Criminal Law and Philosophy, 12(4), 707–723. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11572-018-9454-0
Sinaga, M. R. (2021). Konsep Deffered Prosecution Agreement (DPA) Dalam Upaya Pemberantasan Korupsi Oleh Korporasi Di Indonesia. DE LEGA LATA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 6(1), 80–97.
Tamara, T. (2008). Mediasi Perbankan Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Antara Bank dengan Nasabah dalam Rangka Perlindungan Nasabah. Universitas Indonesia.
Timasheff, N. S., Sutherland, E. H., & Cressey, D. (1955). Principles of Criminology. The American Catholic Sociological Review, 162(2), 143. https://doi.org/10.2307/3708547
Triputra, Y. A. (2011). Tipologi Kejahatan Perbankan Ditinjau dari Undang-Undang Nomor 10 Tahun 1998 Tentang Perbankan. Disiplin, 15(1), 20–26.
Wulandari, C. (2013). Kebijakan Nonpenal dalam Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Perbankan. Pandecta: Research Law Journal, 8(2), 170. https://doi.org/10.15294/pandecta.v8i2.2683
Zulkarnain Sitompul. (2002). Perlindungan Dana Nasabah Bank Suatu Gagasan tentang Pendirian Lembaga Penjamin Simpanan di Indonesia. In Program Pascasarjana. Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Indonesia.
Published
2023-02-26
How to Cite
Hijriani, H., Niasa, L., Dewi, A. L., & Yusuf, M. (2023). Restorative Justice Approach to The Settlement of Banking Crime Cases. Substantive Justice International Journal of Law, 6(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.56087/substantivejustice.v6i1.206
Issue
Section
Articles
Citation Check
License
Authors hold the copyright and give the journal rights to the first publication with the work being simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows others to share the work with the authorship and the initial publication in this journal. Authors free to deposit versions of this work in an institutional or other repository of their choice.
