Constructive Termination of Employment by Indonesia Companies: A Comparative Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33096/substantivejustice.v4i2.143Keywords:
Termination, Employment, Exploitation, LaborAbstract
This research aims to identify the regulation and dispute resolution regarding constructive termination of employment by a company in the perspective of Indonesian Labor Law. This research also compares the constructive termination of employment by companies based on International Law and Japan Labor Law. This is normative legal research with a statutory approach, conceptual approach, and also comparative law approach. The result shows that the constructive termination of employment has not been specifically regulated in the Indonesian Labor Law system, hence it becomes an exploitation gap that is used by companies to be able to terminate employment relations without protecting the worker’s right. The dispute resolution mechanism in terms of constructive termination of employments still refers to the provisions of the Industrial Relations Dispute Settlement Law, namely through bipartite negotiations, tripartite, and industrial relations courts. The constructive termination of employment has been substantively regulated in the ILO Convention C-158 concerning the Termination of Employment, which regulated in Article 4 to Article 6. Further in Japan, the constructive termination of employment is regulated in the Japan Labor Union Act, Act Number 174 of 1949 in Article 7 paragraph (i), (iii), and (iv) with its national enforcement.
Downloads
References
Aziz, M. R., & Noviekayati, I. G. A. A. (2016). Dukungan sosial, efikasi diri dan resiliensi pada karyawan yang terkena pemutusan hubungan kerja. Persona: Jurnal Psikologi Indonesia, 5(01). DOI: https://doi.org/10.30996/persona.v5i01.742
Dau-Schmidt, K. G., Harris, S. D., & Lobel, O. (2009). Labor And Employment Law And Economics. Edward Elgar publishing.
Davies, A. C. (2004). Perspectives on Labour Law. Cambridge University Press.
Denison, E. F., & Chung, W. K. (1976). How Japan's Economy Grew So Fast: The Sources Of Postwar Expansion. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
Fatoni, M. (2016, February 10). Strategi Ini Kerap Digunakan Perusahaan untuk Mangkir Beri Pesangon - Tribun Jogja. https://jogja.tribunnews.com/2016/02/10/strategi-ini-kerap-digunakan-perusahaan-untuk-mangkir-beri-pesangon
Hepple, B. B. (1981). ‘A Right to Work?’. Industrial Law Journal, 10, 65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ilj/10.1.65
Hepple, Bob, 1986, The Making of Labor Law in Europe: A Comparative Study of Nine Countries up to 1945, London and New York, Mansell Publishing Limited.
Hernawan, A. (2016). Keberadaan Uang Pesangon dalam Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja demi Hukum di Perusahaan yang sudah Menyelenggarakan Program Jaminan Pensiun. Kertha Patrika: Jurnal Ilmiah Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana, 38(1). pp. 1. DOI : https://doi.org/10.24843/KP.2016.v38.i01.p01
Jakarta, L. B. H. (2014). Membaca Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial di Indonesia. LBH Jakarta, Jakarta.
Kamal, M. (2020). Workers Protection with a Fixed-Term Employment Contract System based on the Employment Statutory Regulations. Substantive Justice International Journal of Law, 3(2), 180-195. http://dx.doi.org/10.33096/substantivejustice.v3i2.89
Kasman, B. (1987). Japan’s Growth Performance Over The Last Decade. Quarterly Review, 12(Sum), 45–55.
Law Number 11 of 2020 concerning amandement to Law Number 13 of 2003 concerning The Job Creation Act. State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 245 of 2020, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 6573.
Malhotra, O. P. (1973). The Law of Industrial Disputes. NM Tripathi.
Martin, D. L. (1997). "The Economics of Employment Termination Rights." The Journal of Law and Economics 20(1), 187-204. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/466897
Miceli, Thomas, 2004, The Economic Approach to Law, 2nd edition, Stanford, Stanford University Press.
Note, E. (1989). Opportunism and the Need for a Just Cause Standard, 103 Harv. L. REV, 510.
Rupidara, N. S., & McGraw, P. (2010). Institutional Change, Continuity and Decoupling in the Indonesian Industrial Relations System. Journal of Industrial Relations, 52(5), 613–630. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022185610381563
Santoso, B. (2013). Justifikasi efisiensi sebagai alasan pemutusan hubungan kerja. Mimbar Hukum-Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada, 25(3), 402-415. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.16080
Santoso, B. (2017). Pengaturan Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja dalam Perspektif Kepentingan Ekonomi dan Hak Asasi Manusia. Jurnal Media Hukum, 24(2), 115-123. Pp. 117-118. https://doi.org/10.18196/jmh.2017.0087.115-123
Tjandra, S. (2007). Praktek Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial: Panduan Bagi Serikat Buruh. Trade Union Right Centre, Jakarta. https://turc.or.id/
Tjandra, S., & Hanggrahini, R. (2007). Hukum Perburuhan, Desentralisasi, dan Rekonstitusi Rezim Perburuhan'baru'. Jakarta: TURC Discussion Paper No. 5. https://turc.or.id/
Yamakawa, R. (2015). The Law of the Labour Relations Commission: Some Aspects of Japan’s Unfair Labor Practice Law. Japan Labor Review, 12(4).
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Authors hold the copyright and give the journal rights to the first publication with the work being simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows others to share the work with the authorship and the initial publication in this journal. Authors free to deposit versions of this work in an institutional or other repository of their choice.
